posted some stills

thanks all,

it is good to hear praise, a pity the frames loose it some what when captured, compressed, and transfered to video. often i have to watch my stuff projected just to remind myself "i knew i liked that bit."

i am hoping to post some recent images using, (embarrased) a web cam to transfer. so far it has come out surprisingly well.

until then, cheers.

I'm a little late on this one, but they are nice shots.

On "tool shed" did you use existing lighting or did you "light the set?"

by the way, photos submitted to that fotki website will show up in google's image search rather quickly . . . get your film's name in the image filename and you'll get free publicity!

thanks for the comments,

i was a little nervous posting images, you know, is thiers better, clearer, etc.

for the tool shed scene we used natural light and a reflector(tin foil glued onto large cardboard) it came out darker than i wanted, but the silhoette image came out great i thought. the meter read less than 1.8, so i manually bottomed it out.

and i will add the films name to the photo's, one never knows!

gareth

thanks for your comments.

in filmmaking however, having the "better looking" shots doesn't translate into the better film. I thought your shots were interesting enough to comment on so you must be doing something right! good luck.